Thank you Benjamin ;-) Victor Le 10 juin 2017 01:58, "Benjamin Peterson" <benjamin at python.org> a écrit : > The reason we're having this conversation at all is probably a matter of > timing. If MemoryBIO was in Python 3 when PEP 466 was accepted, it surely > would have come along for the ride to 2.7. I believe PEP 466 is generally > considered to have produced positive results. PEP 546, carrying no breaking > changes, is less risky than PEP 466. > > The reluctance to bend 2.7 rules is healthy. This PEP is part of the price > we pay, though, for making a backwards-incompatible release. The security > landscape has and will change over the 10+ python-dev-supported life span > of 2.7. During that time, we have an obligation to keep Python 2 secure. > Part of that is supporting modern security interfaces, which are features. > This change is needed to make another stdlib feature, ensurepip (which is > itself yet another 2.7.x backport) work well. > > Therefore, as 2.7 release manager, I'm accepting the PEP. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > victor.stinner%40gmail.com > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170610/9a0522b0/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4