A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-June/148298.html below:

[Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7

[Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7 [Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7Cory Benfield cory at lukasa.co.uk
Fri Jun 9 15:48:53 EDT 2017
> On 9 Jun 2017, at 20:41, Steve Dower <steve.dower at python.org> wrote:
> 
> These are totally fine for implementing a requests-like API that relies on system configuration for HTTPS connections. They are not sufficient for building a server, but they should be sufficient for downloading the packages you need to build a server.
> 
> This is starting to feel to me like we're stuck on "building the thing right" and have skipped over "building the right thing". But maybe it's just me...

For the purposes of this PEP I think we should exclude this. The only way this works on a decent number of platforms (hi there BSDs and Linuxes) is if the option on those platforms is libcurl. Linux does not ship a high level HTTP client library: libcurl is basically the option. That would require pip binding libcurl, NSURLSession, and the Windows API. It’s not clear to me that the solution to “we don’t want to backport some SSL code” is “write a bunch of bindings to other third-party libraries”.

Cory 
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4