A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-June/148246.html below:

[Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7

[Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7 [Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7Nathaniel Smith njs at pobox.com
Mon Jun 5 20:59:43 EDT 2017
On Jun 5, 2017 7:01 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

On 5 June 2017 at 21:44, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
> Is pip allowed to use the hypothetical _ensurepip_ssl outside of
ensurepip?

Yes, so something like _tls_bootstrap would probably be a better name
for the helper module (assuming we go down the "private API to
bootstrap 3rd party SSL modules" path).


It seems like there's a risk here that we end up with two divergent copies
of ssl.py and _ssl.c inside the python 2 tree, and that this will make it
harder to do future bug fixing and backports. Is this going to cause
problems? Is there any way to mitigate them?

-n
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170605/8c899534/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4