RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jun 1 13:05:58 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-June/148162.html

2017-06-01 18:51 GMT+02:00 Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com>:
> Hmm. So it's really hard to know. Pity. I suppose it's too much to ask
> for IP-based stat exclusion for the most commonly-used CI systems
> (Travis, Circle, etc)? Still, it does look like most pip usage happens
> on Linux. Also, it seems likely that the people who use Python and pip
> heavily are going to be the ones who most care about keeping
> up-to-date with point releases, so I still stand by my belief that
> yes, 2.7.14+ could take the bulk of 2.7's marketshare before 2.7
> itself stops being significant.

It sems like PyPI statistics are public:
https://langui.sh/2016/12/09/data-driven-decisions/

Another article on PyPI stats:
https://hynek.me/articles/python3-2016/

  2.7: 419 millions (89%)
  3.3+3.4+3.5+3.6: 51 millions (11%)
  (I ignored 2.6)

Victor

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-June/148162.html below:

[Python-Dev] RFC: Backport ssl.MemoryBIO and ssl.SSLObject to Python 2.7