RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jul 26 22:34:51 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-July/148769.html

On 2017-07-26 16:36, MRAB wrote:
> "nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't.

Whenever I've used the for-else, I've put a # no-break right next to it, to 
remind myself as much as anyone else.

for...: not break: is the best alternative I've yet seen, congrats.  Perhaps in 
Python 5 it can be enabled, with for-else: used instead for empty iterables, as 
that's what I expected the first few dozen times.

-Mike

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-July/148769.html below:

[Python-Dev] for...else