> On Jan 30, 2017, at 6:26 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > > Actually, I think pkg_resources would make an excellent candidate. The > setuptools crew is working on a branch that would allow for setuptools and > pkg_resources to be split, which would be great for other reasons. Splitting > them may mean that pkg_resources could eventually be added to the stdlib, but > as an intermediate step, it could also test out this idea. It probably has a > lot less of the baggage that you outline. FWIW this is what we do at Facebook. We ship pkg_resources with everything but not setuptools. So there's definitely value in that. It's a little surprising we haven't been doing that yet, given that zipped applications need it. - Ł
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4