On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:30:38 +0000 > Steve Holden <steve at holdenweb.com> wrote: >> Why not declare re deprecated and remove it in Python 4? > > Why deprecate and remove a library that's perfectly usable and > satisfactory for the vast majority of regular expression usage? It's > not like regex presents a radically different API... > > Do we really have to face another wave of stdlib bashing on this > mailing-list? I agree with Antoine. And note that re has an active maintainer who has fixed a bunch of bugs and added some new features in the last few years. --Berker
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4