On Sat, 28 Jan 2017 12:07:05 -0500 Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > On Jan 28, 2017, at 03:43 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > >I still think it could be a good candidate for a first "bundled" > >module, where we don't migrate it fully into the CPython development > >process, but *do* officially bless it and provide it by default in the > >form of a bundled wheel file (similar to what we do with pip). > > How would that work exactly. I.e. is there a PEP? > > While I think it could be a good idea to bundle (more?) third party packages > for a variety of reasons, I want to make sure it's done in a way that's still > friendly to downstream repackagers, as I'm sure you do to. :) That sounds like a lot of effort and maintenance... Don't we bundle pip *exactly* so that we don't have to bundle other third-party packages and instead tell users to "just use `pip install <some package>`"? To sum it up, how about we simply add an official suggestion to use regex in the docs? Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4