On 1/28/2017 9:43 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 27 January 2017 at 22:24, MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: >> On 2017-01-27 17:03, Łukasz Langa wrote: >>> What’s the status of regex inclusion in the stdlib? >>> >> I'm not bothered about it. It's quite a bit bigger than the re module, and, >> anyway, keeping it as a third-party module gives me more freedom to make >> updates, which are available for a range of Python versions. > > I still think it could be a good candidate for a first "bundled" > module, where we don't migrate it fully into the CPython development > process, but *do* officially bless it and provide it by default in the > form of a bundled wheel file (similar to what we do with pip). So like pip, we would bundle the current version, install it in site-packages, and users who use it could upgrade as desired, even after x.y bugfix ends. What would be nice would be to have a short entry in the docs for bundled modules that links to the real doc, wherever it is. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4