On 27/01/2017 17:03, Łukasz Langa wrote: > >> On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:16 PM, MRAB <python at mrabarnett.plus.com >> <mailto:python at mrabarnett.plus.com>> wrote: > >>> So, it seems as if regex already uses a better algorithm although I >>> couldn't find any reference to any regex theoretical framework like dfa, >>> nfa, thompson multiple-state simulation or something. >>> >> It still uses backtracking, like in the re module. > > What’s the status of regex inclusion in the stdlib? > > - Ł > I've asked about this in the past, but have now come to the conclusion that it is way better to leave regex, and many other third party modules, on pypi rather than have them tied into the Python release cycle. If YMMV so be it. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4