On 23 February 2017 at 02:15, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-02-22 16:40 GMT+01:00 Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net>: > > As long as you are asking for "moral" support and not actually > > vouching for the accuracy of third-party translations, then +1 from me. > > The main complain about these translations is the accuracy. > > My bet is that making these translations "official" and more visible > (at docs.python.org) would make them more popular, and so indirectly > help to recruit new contributors. Slowly, the number of translated > pages should increase, but the overall translation quality should also > increase. That's how free software are developed, no? :-) > +1 from me for these reasons, and those Facundo gives: we want folks to be able to learn at least the basics of Python *before* they learn English (even if learning English remains a pre-requisite for tapping into the full capabilities of both the language and its ecosystem). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170224/75766048/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4