A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-February/147350.html below:

[Python-Dev] GitHub migration scheduled for Friday

[Python-Dev] GitHub migration scheduled for Friday [Python-Dev] GitHub migration scheduled for FridayVictor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Wed Feb 8 02:35:04 EST 2017
(Oops, I wrote privately to Brett, so he replied me in private. So
here is a copy of our emails.)

Brett Cannon via gmail.com
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 13:42 Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If I push a patch file written by someone else, should I try to use the author full name + email?

I'm sure the patch author would appreciate it, but I don't think we
need to require it as we have gone this long without it.


> Currently, it requires some tricks to get these informations (the email is partially hidden in the big tracker user list). Or are we moving slowly to GitHub pull requests only?

I hope we're moving quickly and not slowly. :)


> Maybe the simplest option is to ask these informations to the author :-)


I suspect if the patch author is still active you could ask them to
make their patch into a PR and that will solve this problem.

-Brett
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4