On Thu, Dec 28, 2017, at 03:29, Erik Bray wrote: > On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> wrote: > > I imagine Cython already takes care of this? > > This appears to have a distinct purpose, albeit not unrelated to > Cython. The OP's program would generate boilerplate C code for > extension types the rest of which would perhaps be implemented by hand > in C. Cython does this as well to an extent, but the generated code > contains quite a bit of Cython-specific cruft and is not really meant > to be edited by hand or read by humans in most cases. It still seems the OP is likely to reinvent a lot of Cython. One option is to write a bunch of "pure" .c and then only have the Python bindings in Cython. > > Anyways I don't think this answers the OP's question. I think this belongs on python-list anyway.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4