A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-December/151459.html below:

[Python-Dev] Supporting functools.singledispatch with classes.

[Python-Dev] Supporting functools.singledispatch with classes. [Python-Dev] Supporting functools.singledispatch with classes.Ivan Levkivskyi levkivskyi at gmail.com
Tue Dec 26 18:29:08 EST 2017
On 26 December 2017 at 01:41, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 25 December 2017 at 12:32, Ethan Smith <ethan at ethanhs.me> wrote:
> > So at the moment, I don't think it is possible to implement
> singledispatch
> > on classmethod or staticmethod decorated functions.
>
> I've posted this to the PR, but adding it here as well: I think this
> is a situation very similar to the case with functools.partialmethod,
> where you're going to need to write a separate
> functools.singledispatchmethod class that's aware of the descriptor
> protocol, rather than trying to add the functionality directly to
> functools.singledispatch.
>

I agree with Nick here. Adding a separate decorator looks like the right
approach,
especially taking into account the precedent of @partialmethod.

--
Ivan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171227/89074e0e/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4