On 2017-12-22 21:02, Mike Miller wrote: > > On 2017-12-22 12:15, Chris Barker wrote: >> Would it be crazy to bring typing.Any into the builtin namespace? >> >> @dataclass: >> a: Any >> b: Any = 34 >> c: int = 0 >> >> That reads pretty well to me.... > > And having Any available in the built in namespace may help in other cases where > > There is already an "any" function in the builtins. It looks fine but not sure > how it will interact with type checkers. > > The "dataclass.Data" idea mentioned in a sibling thread is good alternative, > though just wordy enough to make ... a shortcut. > The function is "any", the type is "Any", and "any" != "Any", although I wonder how many people will be caught out by that...
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4