I submitted the 3.6 patch that Raymond committed. The purpose of the change was to allow access to the ordering of the columns. It doesn't use any of the OrderedDict-only methods, and I'd be very surprised if a reversion to using dict in 3.7 would cause any tests to fail. regards Steve Steve Holden On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 6:30 AM, 尚辉 <shangdahao at gmail.com> wrote: > Since regular dicts are ordered in 3.7, it might be cleaner to returning regular dict instead of OrderedDict? > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > steve%40holdenweb.com > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171218/7ddfe81d/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4