On Dec 14, 2017 21:30, "Raymond Hettinger" <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 14, 2017, at 6:03 PM, INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote: > > If "dict keeps insertion order" is not language spec and we > continue to recommend people to use OrderedDict to keep > order, I want to optimize OrderedDict for creation/iteration > and memory usage. (See https://bugs.python.org/issue31265#msg301942 ) I support having regular dicts maintain insertion order but am opposed to Inada changing the implementation of collections.OrderedDict We can have the first without having the second. It seems like the two quoted paragraphs are in vociferous agreement. -n -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171214/9243603a/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4