A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-December/151185.html below:

[Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?

[Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional? [Python-Dev] Is static typing still optional?Eric V. Smith eric at trueblade.com
Sun Dec 10 16:37:35 EST 2017
On 12/10/2017 4:29 PM, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
> On 10 December 2017 at 22:24, Raymond Hettinger 
> <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com <mailto:raymond.hettinger at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Without typing (only the first currently works):
> 
>          Point = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y', 'z'])          #
>     underlying store is a tuple
>          Point = make_dataclass('Point', ['x', 'y', 'z'])      #
>     underlying store is an instance dict
> 
> 
> Hm, I think this is a bug in implementation. The second form should also 
> work.

Agreed.

I have a bunch of pending changes for dataclasses. I'll add this.

Eric.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4