OK, then please just change the PEP's Version: header to 3.8. On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 7:57 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 6, 2017 20:31, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote: > > If the point is just to be able to test the existing API better, no PEP is > needed, right? It would be an unsupported, undocumented API. > > > In the short term that's one major goal. In the long term the > functionality provided by the PEP is a prerequisite for other > concurrency-related features, and targeting 3.8 for that is fine. :) > > -eric > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171206/5eb48097/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4