RetroSearch Browse

Wed Dec 6 22:57:55 EST 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-December/151123.html

On Dec 6, 2017 20:31, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote:

If the point is just to be able to test the existing API better, no PEP is
needed, right? It would be an unsupported, undocumented API.

In the short term that's one major goal.  In the long term the
functionality provided by the PEP is a prerequisite for other
concurrency-related features, and targeting 3.8 for that is fine. :)

-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20171206/c8d7bf06/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-December/151123.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 554 v4 (new interpreters module)