On 12/3/2017 8:31 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Sun, Dec 3, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Eric V. Smith <eric at trueblade.com > <mailto:eric at trueblade.com>> wrote: > > On 12/3/2017 3:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > Thanks. I have to ask: why don't "asdict" and "astuple" respect > PEP 8 > naming? > > > I guess it depends if you think the underscore is needed to improve > readability. "Function names should be lowercase, with words > separated by underscores as necessary to improve readability." > > I don't feel strongly enough about it to change it, but part of that > is because I'm burned out on the PEP, so I might not be a good one > to judge at this point. I guess if I clear my head and I were doing > it from scratch again I'd make them as_dict and as_tuple, so maybe I > should brush aside inertia and make the change. > > > The Python stdlib is incredibly inconsistent where it comes to inserting > underscores. I think in this case it matches `namedtuple._asdict()` and > that's good enough for me. It also matches `attrs.asdict()`, which is what originally inspired it. Eric.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4