On 2 December 2017 at 12:01, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info> wrote: > The PEP only mentions function?() as a rejected idea, do I don't know > why we're even talking about it. The PEP is deferred, with considerable > opposition and luke-warm support, even the PEP author has said he's not > going to push for it, and we're arguing about a pedantic point related > to a part of the PEP which is rejected... Nevertheless, I've fixed the rationale for that decision so folks don't get hung up on the mistake in the previously noted rationale: https://github.com/python/peps/commit/966dd426787e6de8ec6218955cec57f65086c5b4 Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4