On 8/31/2017 3:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2017 at 02:56 Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com > do so to squash their PRs themselves. Personally, I'd prefer that as, > apart from admin activities like making sure the PR and issue number > references are present and correct, I think the original submitter has > a better chance of properly summarising the PR in the merged commit > message anyway. My experience is different. > So you would want a comment when the PR reaches "awaiting merge" with > instructions requesting the author do their own squash commit to My impression is that this makes the individual commits disappear. > simplify the message for us? Not me. -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4