On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:01 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: [..] > P.S. And I say that as a reader who correctly guessed why you had > changed the method name in the current iteration of the proposal. I'm > sympathetic to those reasons, but I think sticking with the > conventional API will make this one easier to learn and use :) Yeah, I agree. We'll switch lookup -> get in the next iteration. Guido's parallel with getattr/setattr/delattr is also useful. getattr can also lookup the attribute in base classes, but we still call it "get". Yury
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4