On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Sven R. Kunze <srkunze at mail.de> wrote: > [..] >> Why not the same interface as thread-local storage? This has been the >> question which bothered me from the beginning of PEP550. I don't understand >> what inventing a new way of access buys us here. > > This was covered at length in these threads: > > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-August/046888.html > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2017-August/046889.html FWIW, it would still be nice to have a simple replacement for the following under PEP 550: class Context(threading.local): ... Transitioning from there to PEP 550 is non-trivial. -eric
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4