RetroSearch Browse

Mon Aug 28 12:16:36 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-August/149013.html

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 11:53 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com> wrote:
> A question appeared here about a simple mental model for PEP 550.
> It looks much clearer now, than in the first version, but I still would like
> to clarify: can one say that PEP 550 just provides more fine-grained version
> of threading.local(), that works not only per thread, but even per coroutine
> within the same thread?

Simple model:

1. Values in the EC propagate down the call stack for both synchronous
and asynchronous code.

2. For regular functions/code EC works the same way as threading.local().

Yury

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-August/149013.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 550 v4