RetroSearch Browse

Mon Aug 28 10:17:46 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-August/149003.html

Well, this talk may be a bit of bike-shedding, but

+1 for a separate module/sub module

And full -1 for something named

"dynscopevars"

That word is unreadable, barely mnemonic, but plain "ugly" - (I know that
this is  subjective, but it is just that :-) )

Why not just "execution_context"  or "sys.execution_context" ?

"from execution_context import Var, lookup, set, LogicalContext, run_with  "

On 27 August 2017 at 12:51, Jim J. Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think there is general consensus that this should go in a module other
> than sys. (At least a submodule.)
>
> The specific names are still To Be Determined, but I suspect seeing the
> functions and objects as part of a named module will affect what works.
>
> So I am requesting that the next iteration just pick a module name, and
> let us see how that looks.  E.g
>
> import dynscopevars
>
> user=dynscopevars.Var ("username")
>
> myscope=dynscopevars.get_current_scope()
>
> childscope=dynscopevars.Scope (parent=myscope,user="bob")
>
>
> -jJ
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/
> jsbueno%40python.org.br
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20170828/7452622e/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-August/149003.html below:

[Python-Dev] Pep 550 module