RetroSearch Browse

Fri Apr 7 14:50:44 EDT 2017 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-April/147760.html

On 4/7/2017 12:27 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:

> I succeeded to compute benchmarks on CPython master on the period
> April, 2014-April,2017: we now have have a timeline over 3 years of
> CPython performance!
>
>    https://speed.python.org/timeline/

The boxes are un-scaled.  Is vertical always 'time for fixed work', so 
lower is always better?  The vertical variation is a small fraction of 
vertical space, so most vertical space is wasted.

   Box says 'last 50', but only 13 results.  These cover last 3 years?

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2017-April/147760.html below:

[Python-Dev] CPython benchmark status, April 2017