A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-September/146387.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered

[Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become ordered [Python-Dev] Python 3.6 dict becomes compact and gets a private version; and keywords become orderedVictor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Sun Sep 11 04:42:28 EDT 2016
2016-09-10 23:24 GMT-04:00 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>:
> To conform with the updated language spec, implementations just need
> to use collections.OrderedDict in 3 places:
>
> (...)
> - storage type for passing kwargs to functions

I'm not sure about the "just need" for this one, especially if you
care of performances ;-)

I mean, it's not easy to write an *efficient* hash table preserving
the insertion order. Otherwise, CPython would have one since Python
1.5 :-)

Victor
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4