On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull
<turnbull.stephen.fw at u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
> Finally, the notion of annotating expressions is incoherent:
>
> # Annotating (sub)expressions: the more the merrier!
> (x) : bool = (((y): int + (z): float) / (w): complex): quarternion
> # Ooh, an expression with no past and no future. Annotate it!
> (y + z) / w: quarternion
Can't do that - parsing would become ambiguous.
x = {1:int, 1.5:float, 2+3j:complex}
print(type(x))
ChrisA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4