A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-September/146203.html below:

[Python-Dev] Please reject or postpone PEP 526

[Python-Dev] Please reject or postpone PEP 526 [Python-Dev] Please reject or postpone PEP 526Mark Shannon mark at hotpy.org
Mon Sep 5 10:19:46 EDT 2016
On 04/09/16 21:16, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Everybody please stop panicking. PEP 526 does not make a stand on the
> behavior of type checkers (other than deferring to PEP 484). If you
> want to start a discussion about constraining type checkers please do
> it over at python-ideas. There is no rush as type checkers are not
> affected by the feature freeze.
>

Indeed, we shouldn't panic. We should take our time, review this 
carefully and make sure that the version of typehints that lands in 3.7 
is one that we most of us are happy with and all of us can at least 
tolerate.

Cheers,
Mark.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4