RetroSearch Browse

Sat Sep 3 07:35:41 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-September/146107.html

> Le samedi 3 septembre 2016, Random832 <random832 at fastmail.com> a écrit :
>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016, at 19:44, Ethan Furman wrote:
>> > The problem with only having `bchr` is that it doesn't help with
>> > `bytearray`;
>>
>> What is the use case for bytearray.fromord? Even in the rare case
>> someone needs it, why not bytearray(bchr(...))?

On 3 September 2016 at 08:47, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, this was my point: I don't think that we need a bytearray method to
> create a mutable string from a single byte.

I agree with the above. Having an easy way to turn an int into a bytes
object is good. But I think the built-in bchr() function on its own is
enough. Just like we have bytes object literals, but the closest we
have for a bytearray literal is bytearray(b". . .").

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-September/146107.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 467: last round (?)