Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-October/146596.html below:

[Python-Dev] Is explicit registration of Iterators needed?

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is explicit registration of Iterators needed?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 07.10.16 18:08, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Should we register missed builtin iterators? For example longrange_iterator.
>
> I don't feel strongly about this either way. Let sleeping dogs lie,
> etc. (Is this related to issue 26906?)

Not directly. If remove explicit iterator registrations some tests 
become failing due to the bug 26906. After fixing issue26906 the tests 
are passed again. Thus the bug 26906 could be found earlier if iterators 
were not registered.

• Previous message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Is explicit registration of Iterators needed?
• Next message (by thread): [Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4