RetroSearch Browse

Mon Nov 28 06:06:38 EST 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-November/146868.html

Ok, thanks. I pushed my patch.

Victor

2016-11-27 16:37 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Hylton <jeremy at alum.mit.edu>:
> I don't think there's any need to keep this feature. I hope we have better
> ways to profile function and method calls now than we did when this code was
> submitted.
>
> Jeremy
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 3:34 AM Raymond Hettinger
> <raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 25, 2016, at 1:28 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > I would like to completely remove the feature to be able to implement
>> > further optimizations.
>>
>> This seems reasonable to me.  I've never used or needed this special
>> build; StackOverflow has no mention of it; and a Google search comes up
>> nearly empty.   That said, it might be worthwhile to check with Jeremy to
>> get his thoughts before removing his code.
>>
>>
>> Raymond

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-November/146868.html below:

[Python-Dev] Does anyone use CALL_PROFILE special build?