RetroSearch Browse

Sun Nov 27 10:37:11 EST 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-November/146866.html

I don't think there's any need to keep this feature. I hope we have better
ways to profile function and method calls now than we did when this code
was submitted.

Jeremy

On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 3:34 AM Raymond Hettinger <
raymond.hettinger at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> > On Nov 25, 2016, at 1:28 AM, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I would like to completely remove the feature to be able to implement
> > further optimizations.
>
> This seems reasonable to me.  I've never used or needed this special
> build; StackOverflow has no mention of it; and a Google search comes up
> nearly empty.   That said, it might be worthwhile to check with Jeremy to
> get his thoughts before removing his code.
>
>
> Raymond
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20161127/0e20242e/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-November/146866.html below:

[Python-Dev] Does anyone use CALL_PROFILE special build?