A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-November/146812.html below:

[Python-Dev] Benchmarks: Comparison between Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 performance

[Python-Dev] Benchmarks: Comparison between Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 performance [Python-Dev] Benchmarks: Comparison between Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 performanceAntoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Sat Nov 5 05:56:04 EDT 2016
Hi Victor,

On Fri, 4 Nov 2016 13:53:10 +0100
Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Raw results of Python 3.6 compared to Python 2.7:

That's interesting, but I would be personally more interested in
a performance comparison of 3.5 and 3.6, to know if anything
interesting (or worrying :-)) has happened there.

The performance differences between 2.7 and 3.x are quite well-known by
now, and none of them are really dramatic except for the increase in
startup time.

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4