A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-November/146811.html below:

[Python-Dev] [Speed] Benchmarks: Comparison between Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 performance

[Python-Dev] [Speed] Benchmarks: Comparison between Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 performance [Python-Dev] [Speed] Benchmarks: Comparison between Python 2.7 and Python 3.6 performanceVictor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Fri Nov 4 16:56:21 EDT 2016
2016-11-04 20:18 GMT+01:00 Miquel Torres <tobami at gmail.com>:
> Nice! For the record, I'll be giving a talk in PyCon Ireland about
> Codespeed. Would you mind me citing those tweets and screenshots, to
> highlight usage on speed.python.org?

Sure. Keep me in touch in you publish your slides later.


> You mentioned new more reliable vs old results. How close are we to have an
> stable setup that gives us benchmarks numbers regularly?

My plan for the short term is to analyze last (latest?) benchmarks
hiccups and try to fix them.

The fully automated script to run benchmarks is already written:
https://github.com/python/performance/tree/master/scripts

Then, the plan we decided with Zachary Ware is to run a script in a
loop which compiles the default branch of CPython. Later, we may also
do the same for 2.7 and 3.6 branches. And then add PyPy (and PyPy 3).

Victor
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4