On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Eric V. Smith <eric at trueblade.com> wrote: > 2. The parser sees that it's an f-string, and breaks it into expression and > text parts. I'm with Fabio here. It would be really nice to have a grammar specified and documented for this step, even if it's not implemented that way. Otherwise it's going to be very hard for, e.g., syntax highlighters to know what is intended to be allowed.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4