On 02/11/2016 06:23, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Rasmus Villemoes writes: > > > First, apologies if this isn't the appropriate list; I trust I'll be > > nudged in the right direction. > > Given the relatively advanced state of patch, I doubt that this is the > *wrong* list. However, you would probably benefit from posting to > python-list at python.org to collect use cases. (We don't "vote" on such > additions. Rather the senior devs consider whether the use cases seem > general enough to justify on-going maintenance costs for new code.) > > > I would of course also be very interested in getting it into 2.7.x, > > but I assume that's impossible(?). > > That is correct. This is clearly a feature, and 2.7 currently is > accepting only security-related patches (broadly construed -- a > sufficiently severe bug, such as a crash or infloop, is security- > related because it could be used to implement a DoS attack). > Surely patches related to any bugs, not just security related ones, will be accepted until EOL in 2020? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4