Type clone sounds good. But I am still inclined more towards "distinct". -- Ivan 29 Тра 2016 01:04 "Chris Jerdonek" <chris.jerdonek at gmail.com> пише: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> > wrote: > > We discussed this over dinner at PyCon, some ideas we came up with: > > > > - Dependent types, harking back to a similar concept in Ada > > (https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Type_System#Derived_types > ) > > which in that language is also spelled with "new". > > > > - New type > > > > - Distinguished Type > > > > - Distinguished Subtype > > > > - Distinguished Type Alias > > > > - Distinguished Alias > > > > - BoatyMcBoatType > > Some more suggestions: > > - Cloned Type (or Type Clone) > > - Copied Type (or Type Copy) > > - Named Type > > - Renamed Type > > - Twin Type > > - Wrapped Type > > - Doppelganger Type (not serious) > > --Chris > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/levkivskyi%40gmail.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160529/491c9805/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4