There is another interesting idea from Twitter: call them type wrappers. -- Ivan On 28 May 2016 at 11:01, Ivan Levkivskyi <levkivskyi at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 28 May 2016 at 06:26, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > > Personally I'm still in favor of Derived type (but I'm more into > > ancient programming languages than most folks here). I could also live > > with Distinguished Type. > > I think both "derived" and "distinguished" are OK, but I am more in favour of "distinguished". > The reason is sometimes people might talk about derived types while meaning normal derived classes. > Also, indeed "distinguished" is a rare word, so that it will not cause confusions and easy to look up. > > -- > Ivan > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160528/0cc02b03/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4