On 05/27/2016 11:31 AM, Daniel Holth wrote: > > BLAKE2 is important, since it removes the last objection to replacing MD5 - > speed - that has made it hard for cryptography fans to convince MD5 users > to upgrade. > I have had to stick to MD5 for performance reasons (2 seconds in MD5 or 9.6 seconds in SHA256, IIRC) in scenarios that did not require an SHA*. Having BLAKE2 around wouldn't be a necessity, but if it shipped with newer versions of Python eventually there would be a commit switching the underlying hash function.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4