RetroSearch Browse

Fri May 20 12:43:09 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-May/144675.html

Three questions:

   1. Should pathlib gain __fspath__() all the way back to 3.4?
   2. Should pathlib's constructor support __fspath__() all the way back to
   3.4? (separate question as os.fspath() will only be in 3.6; and if we
   backport I'm not looking forward to making Typeshed happy w/o os.PathLike
   being available only in 3.6 :/)
   3. Should the docs from 3.4 and forward reflect the removal of the
   provisional status? (I assume yes, but wanted to double-check)

And a quick thanks to Guido for removing `path` from pathlib for me
already. :)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160520/4ba9934a/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-May/144675.html below:

[Python-Dev] Removing the provisional label from pathlib