On 05/12/2016 01:59 PM, Sjoerd Job Postmus wrote: >> On 12 May 2016, at 21:30, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> >> If you need bytes support for your paths, there's at least one [1] that has that support. > > So if I would need bytes support, I should submit a pull request to <arbitrary but awesome > library> which replaces usage of the stdlib pathlib with another variant, upon which they > will decline the pull request because it introduces another "useless" dependency. My apologies, I thought you were talking about your own code. As far as <arbitrary but awesome library> -- it wouldn't be awesome to me if I couldn't pass in the data types I need. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4