On 05/11/2016 01:44 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: >> os.path >> ''''''' >> >> The various path-manipulation functions of ``os.path`` [#os-path]_ >> will be updated to accept path objects. For polymorphic functions that >> accept both bytes and strings, they will be updated to simply use >> code very much similar to >> ``path.__fspath__() if hasattr(path, '__fspath__') else path``. This >> will allow for their pre-existing type-checking code to continue to >> function. > > I afraid that this will hit a performance. Some os.path functions are > used in tight loops, they are hard optimized, and adding support of path > protocol can have visible negative effect. Do you have an example of os.path functions being used in a tight loop? -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4