On 11.05.16 19:43, Brett Cannon wrote: > os.path > ''''''' > > The various path-manipulation functions of ``os.path`` [#os-path]_ > will be updated to accept path objects. For polymorphic functions that > accept both bytes and strings, they will be updated to simply use > code very much similar to > ``path.__fspath__() if hasattr(path, '__fspath__') else path``. This > will allow for their pre-existing type-checking code to continue to > function. I afraid that this will hit a performance. Some os.path functions are used in tight loops, they are hard optimized, and adding support of path protocol can have visible negative effect. I suggest first implement other changes and then look whether it is worth to add support of path protocol in os.path functions.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4