RetroSearch Browse

Wed May 11 14:16:27 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-May/144512.html

On Wed, 11 May 2016 at 10:49 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:

> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 11 May 2016 at 09:47 Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>>
>>> If the authors are happy I'll accept it right away.
>>>
>>> (I vaguely recall there's another PEP that's ready for pronouncement --
>>> but which one?)
>>>
>>
>> PEP 509 is the only one I can think of.
>>
>
> That's in limbo pending conclusive proof (through benchmarks) that at
> least one of Yury's patches that depends on it makes a big enough
> difference.
>
> Which IIUC itself is in limbo pending the wordcode changes (we're doing
> that right?).
>

Yes. Last I checked the author of the patch was waiting on a review from
Serhiy.

-Brett

>
> --
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160511/7c7f45de/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-May/144512.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 515: Underscores in Numeric Literals (revision 3)