On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 16:00 Mark Lawrence via Python-Dev < python-dev at python.org> wrote: > On 05/05/2016 23:22, Stefan Krah wrote > > > > Fredrik Lundh is also affected (and might not have received any mail, > > same as me): > > > > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PIL > > > > He might be, but clearly the Python community as a whole is not > impacted. From what I see the latest version of PIL that is available > is 1.1.6, which requires Python 1.5.2 or higher, and has the following > stats:- > > 0 downloads in the last day > 0 downloads in the last week > 0 downloads in the last month > > I wish I could vent my feelings regarding your comments earlier in this > thread but I won't, as apparently core developers can say what they like > with no comeback, I don't think that's fair. Several people pointed out that Stefan's initial email was off-topic and somewhat rude, but was probably given some slack due to the fact that having deployments to the Cheeseshop fail can be frustrating (leeway I think anyone posting here would have received). At this point I think there's nothing new to be said and unless someone wants to take a more drastic step like a formal CoC complaint or calling for the heads of the management of distutils-sig on spikes, this thread has run its course. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20160506/8e1709c4/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4