On 03/01/2016 03:14 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote: > The difference is that the copy module sets object's state before adding > items and key-value pairs, but the pickle module sets object's state > after adding items and key-value pairs. If append() or __setitem__() > depend on the state of the object, the pickling is incompatible with the > copying. Aren't there tests to ensure the unpickled/copied object are identical to the original object? Under which circumstances would they be different? -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4