RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jun 28 16:55:56 EDT 2016 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145442.html

Awesome. That addresses my last concerns. PEP 520 is now accepted.
Congratulations!

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I suppose I'm having a hard time letting go of the attractiveness of
>>> "read-only == complete".  However, given that you've been pretty clear
>>> what you think, I'm more at ease about it. :)
>>
>> Yeah, it's time to drop it. ;-)
>
> Thanks for the feedback.  I've updated the PEP to resolve the open
> questions.  Most notably, I've dropped the read-only constraint on the
> __definition_order__ attribute.  Please let me know if you have any
> other outstanding concerns.  Otherwise I think this PEP is ready for
> pronouncement. :)
>
> -eric

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2016-June/145442.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 520: Preserving Class Attribute Definition Order (round 5)